Just after the start of 2026, Google parent Alphabet became more valuable than Apple for the first time since 2019, a technically meaningless milestone, but a symbolically powerful one. And itβs still true that Apple is the less valuable company, and Googleβs AI partnership with Apple is perceived as a big part of why.
Now, according to Bloombergβs machine gun of Apple scoops Mark Gurman, Apple is weeks away from demoing the product of that partnership: its revamped version of Siri. For Appleβs sake, it had better not suck.
Next month we should expect βdemonstrations of the functionalityβ of Siri at some sort of Apple event, possibly a small one, Gurman says. This new Siri will be powered by a Google-built AI model, but Apple wonβt tip users off about that while theyβre using it. In fact, even internally itβs called βApple Foundation Models version 10,β Gurman notes. This new Siri will, if all goes according to plan, just work a lot better than what iPhones and other Apple devices are currently armed with.
Siri is perhaps best understood as the organizing βpersonalityβ of the Apple Home software and hardware ecosystem, and itβs sortaβ¦ fine as a smart home assistant. Itβs comparable to similar products from Amazon and Google, with a few more tendencies that chafe slightly, like how it may respond to basic informational questions with info-dumps that start with phrases like βHere are two options!β Or it will just glitch out and say something like βUh-oh! Thereβs a problem.β
When used on an iPhone, Siri feels a little like having a smart home assistant in your pocket, which, why? If your phone is in your hand and you want to set a timer, youβre looking right at the Clock app icon and youβll probably just use that. If you want something that can answer questions conversationally, you can just use a product like Claude, or ChatGPT, or Gemini, or, hell, Microsoft Copilot.
With all that in mind, Gurman subtly describes the new version of Siri as a productivity beast. The new version βshould be able to tap into personal data and on-screen content to fulfill tasks.β That sounds nothing like the current iteration of Siri, which feels like a naive being called into existence in the moment with no context about whatβs going on. It would indeed be powerful to have a Siri that can respond nimbly to what the user is doing, and incorporate the data already in their phone to provide actual help. Based on descriptions like this, I can imagine looking at an event website, for instance, and saying βHey Siri, do I have time for this?β and then getting a decent answer.Β
And Gurman says this Siri will βbe conversational, aware of relevant context and capable of sustained back-and-forth dialogue,β which also means itβs meant to take a real bite of the chatbot market. Where Siri once relied on ChatGPT (arguably too much), it will now, in theory, compete with it.
But the Apple-Google partnership driving the new Siri is interesting trivia at best, and most people wonβt care or notice, because, as Gurman notes, βApple is a product company,β and βthe provenance of the technology is mostly irrelevant.β That means if the takeaway by March is βLol, Siri still sucks,β Apple is going to pay the price in terms of public perception, not Google. And Google gets its $1 billion either way.Β

